Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
http://www.state.sd.us/doa/secretary/
WEEKLY NEWS FROM THE SECRETARY, 4/24/06
Rich farmers?
As we debate how the farm bill should be
rewritten, it is interesting to see the news
stories saying how well our farmers are doing
financially.
Recent stories say farm income is up in North
Dakota and Minnesota, but down slightly in South
Dakota.
Several wire service news items discuss a new
release from USDA entitled "Economic Well-Being of
Farm Households".
Some stories give the impression that farming pays
well. Farm households have "median wealth" five
times that of the national average household, and
in recent years have higher annual income than the
United States "average" household income of
$59,000, they say.
That news sounds great until one reads other facts
in the report, such as (on average) 93% of farm
households make no positive net income from their
farming operations.
How do these families live? Not from farming.
About 90 percent of their income is from off-farm
jobs or investments. That is not new. Since the
1960s, most farm household income has come from
off-farm sources, while farming pays only about
ten to twenty thousand dollars a year. Only the
percent is new. It has risen from 50% in the
1960s.
Farming contributes no income (or causes a loss)
for most operations generating less than $100,000
a year. That group is 85 % of all farm
households.
In recent times, farm household income has
followed the national trend simply because farming
has very little to do with the farmer’s income
level. In the last few years, large farms pushed
the "average" above the average nonfarm household
income level.
The small operations (85% of farms) get only about
20% of commodity payments. The next size (8% of
farms) generating between $100,000 and $250,000
get about 27% of the payments. The next size
(4%), generating over $250,000 but less than
$500,000 get 23% of the payments, and the really
big operations (3%) get about 30%.
The study also looks at farm wealth. The small
farms produce only about 15% of our food and make
very little income, but they have farm equity
ranging from a quarter to half a million dollars.
Within the farm income spectrum, there is a group
on one end who may not be helped by government
subsidies and a group at the other end who may not
need subsidies. Congress could fix that, maybe.
You never know what will come from a congressional
"fix".
Averages can be misleading and only hint at
reality. An "average" may not be accurate for
anyone and they vary locally. One could say that
South Dakota farmers are three times better than
the national average, because (on average) only
about a third lose money in any given year.
In the meantime, remember this: if you sell $1,000
worth of stuff from your garden, you are a real
USDA-qualified "farmer", even if you never make a
cent of net profit.
The only way to guarantee failure is to not try. Larry Gabriel
========================================================================
|
Home
Page Updated: Thursday May 07, 2009 09:14 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2005, All Rights Reserved